Topics for rogerian argument
Thursday, August 27, 2020
The Catcher In The Rye Is A Story Of An Emotionally Disturebed Young S
The Catcher in the Rye is an account of a sincerely disturebed youthful multi year old kid named Holden Caulfield. Holden is telling this in first individual, despite the fact that the entire thing is each of the one major flashback. The story is one of a little fellow attempting to experience childhood in an Adult world. Holden, being the Idealist that he is, looked to see everything that needs as changed, yet never gives an option in contrast to the circumstance or thing. In the four all out days that the story spread, Holden winds up getting himself from Pencey to New York where he and his sister meet. While with his sister, he sees the young lady in her, so inocent to the world around herm that he believes is so discouraging. He attempts to shield Phoebe from the world by not letting her do things that he is doning. So in a sence, Holden is himself, a wolf in sheep's clothing, by doing specific things and afterward turing around and advising her to do them. The story starts and end in the Mental Hospital or Resting Home as he called it. The story finishes as Holden is conversing with a specialist as though he were recounting to this entire story to the specialist. This is a representative completion of this story, on the grounds that Holden consistently imagined that he didn't have to impart his discouraging stories to others. Additionally, he didn't care for tuning in to others reveal to him their discouraging stories.
Saturday, August 22, 2020
EX 5-22 Computerized Accounting Systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1
EX 5-22 Computerized Accounting Systems - Essay Example Control accounts are set up from other budget summaries and before the control records can be shut, a compromise explanation is generally arranged to guarantee that all the sums of all qualities concur (Warren, Reeve and Duchac, 2012). The unending stock framework refreshes the records as considered fit to be contrasted with the intermittent stock framework where records are refreshed occasionally. In this manner in the ceaseless stock framework, the updates are made after each exchange subsequently giving increasingly exact figures.The figure introduced as the gross benefit will along these lines change if an interminable framework was utilized. This is because of the way that all exchanges made would have just been recorded. Why arenââ¬â¢t uncommon diary sums presented on control accounts toward the month's end in an electronic bookkeeping framework? An electronic bookkeeping framework calls for posting of the considerable number of records and aggregates on the PC framework. In any case, there are some unique diaries that don't call for posting of the sums toward the month's end is because of potential outcomes of mistakes. Control accounts are set up from other budget reports and before the control records c an be shut, a compromise proclamation is generally arranged to guarantee that all the aggregates of all qualities concur (Warren, Reeve and Duchac, 2012). The accompanying information were extricated from the bookkeeping records of Danhof Company for the year finished June 30, 2012: à Merchandise stock, July 1, 2011, $ 250,000 à Merchandise stock, June 30, 2012, 325,000 Purchasesâ â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â 2,100,000 Buys returns and allowancesâ â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â à â â â â 50,000 Buys discountsâ â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â à â â â â 39,000 Salesâ â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â 3,250,000 Cargo inâ â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â à â â â â 12,500
Friday, August 21, 2020
Should I Make a Resume for College Applications TKG
Should I Make a Resume for College Applications How To: Formate a Resume for you College ApplicationBy: Caroline KoppelmanAt the start of high school you probably walked through the club fair and signed up for more clubs than you could ever possibly manage. Now, as you apply to college, youâre probably only a member of about half of them. Youâve stayed in these clubs because they piqued your interest and clearly relate to what youâre passionate about. The reason that the college admissions committee wants to know what youâve spent your time doing in high school is because your engagement speaks to your character. If youâve been going home everyday directly after school ends and doing nothing, they see that youâre not engaged in your community. But, if youâve been volunteering as a tutor or raising money for a local charity, then that gives them insight into your personality.In order to optimize the potential of your application itâs best to submit a resume that highlights your academic achievements and extracurricu lar involvement. A resume is an organized and easily accessible document that shows that you care about what the admissions committee reads about you. There are certain categories that you want to include in this resume so that it covers aspects of your application that arenât necessarily included in the collegeâs formal app.Honors and Distinctions: This is a section that includes any academic awards youâve received. Whether it was a science olympiad medal or an honor roll certificate, they should be mentioned.Extracurricular Activities: List every club youâre a part of and if you hold a position (president, vice president, etc). These should be clubs that relate to different parts of your application to add credibility. So if youâre a member of the school newspaper and have mentioned youâre interested in journalism, add it! If you plan on heading on the engineering track, donât forget to mention the robotics club that youâre the treasurer of. Donât forget to expla in what the activity is. Employment: This is supposed to highlight any jobs that youâve had during high school so that admissions can see that your grades have remained stellar throughout doing both extracurriculars and having a real job. Community Service: This creates context for your potential impact on the specific school youâre applying to. We recommend listing any philanthropic event that youâve organized or been a part of.Personal Interests: This is just a short list of hobbies and things you do in your free time. While admissions is interested in your academic qualifications, they also want students that have quirky interests and spend their time doing unique and fun things.All of these things will work to enhance your application. Since the common app doesnât provide enough space for you to explain your involvement in a way that makes it seem substantial and impressive, this resume will supplement that deficit. Plus, formatting and organizing this document are ski lls that will come in handy for the future when you need to write another resume!
Monday, May 25, 2020
Plagiarism And Its Effect On The Academic Assessment System
Introduction In the age of advance technology and internet, plagiarism has become an increasingly complex issue. Petress (2003) argues that such phenomenon distorts the rewarding sense of hard work, destroys ethical value of honesty and undermines the academic assessment systems. Moreover, (Gullifer Tyson, 2010) believe that plagiarism denies studentsââ¬â¢ chances to develop essential academic skills and consequently causes difficulty to progress their degree. As a result, many western and Australian universities have established systems to detect and punish plagiarism-related activities. However, (Devlin Gray, 2007) point out that those systems are unreliable because they are based on untested assumptions that such behaviour isâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦However, early research tends to focus only on individual motives and neglect the impact of social, cultural and physical environment on studentsââ¬â¢ behaviours. For example, peer attitude towards cheatings, peer pressure or cultural acceptance of plagiarism can significantly influence idiosyncratic perceptions and actions. Cultural reasons are also increasingly important in the age of internalisation in education with abundance of overseas students in western countries. As pointed out in (Guo, 2011), (Alam, 2004), (Ashworth et al., 2003) and (Johnson Clerehan, 2005), many international students come from East Asia where copying work with little or no reference is the norm or whe re education system focus on other assessment criteria than written assignments. Therefore, it is expected that they are unacquainted with referencing and writing skills. A later study (Park, 2003) successfully discusses social and cultural factors by drawing conclusion from previous literature to UK higher education context. Some of his notable findings are ââ¬Å"lack of apprehension about referencing requirementâ⬠, ââ¬Å"poor time managementâ⬠, ââ¬Å"peer tolerance towards plagiarismâ⬠, ââ¬Å"temptation to plagiarise due to abundant digitalised informationâ⬠, ââ¬Å"negative attitudes towards teachersâ⬠and ââ¬Å"low risk of getting caughtâ⬠. Nevertheless, the
Thursday, May 14, 2020
Analysis Of The Book Angela s Ashes - 1259 Words
What defines true happiness? Happiness is like the white light that guides you through the darkest of tunnels, helps you get through the toughest of times and the most difficult obstacles. Everybody has their own true happiness just like everybody has their own personality. Some may argue that true happiness is settling down with a wife and having a family but on the contrary many may argue that being single and living life on their own is the way to be. We will see the similar thoughts of this white light trending through each these three books; An American Childhood, This Boys Life, and Angelaââ¬â¢s Ashes. In the book Angelaââ¬â¢s Ashes, we can see this notion come true through Frank McCourtââ¬â¢s writings. Frank lives in a cold wet Ireland a place that does not always scream happiness. He lives a daily life of poverty, constantly struggling to find food. It didnââ¬â¢t help anything that his father was an alcoholic and sat in the pub every Friday to drink away the famil yââ¬â¢s money for food. The death of family members is a constant reminder to Frank the darkness of Ireland and the clear state of depression that him and his family was in. Frank had to take all of this in at a young age forcing the poor child to mature quickly for his age. All Frank dreamed of doing was leaving Ireland and proving everyone who looked down on him wrong. He wanted to rise from poverty and be able to help his family. We can see this drive to leave Ireland and the poverty, we see this as Franks white light.Show MoreRelatedReed Supermarket Case32354 Words à |à 130 Pagespublisher any trademark ownership rights in such trademarks, nor does the use of such trademarks imply any afï ¬ liation with or endorsement of this book by such owners. Pearson Education is not responsible for the content of third party internet sites. ISBN 978-0-273-72622-7 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Li brary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hollensen, Svend. Global marketing : a decision-orientedRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words à |à 656 Pageslamentable. Taken together, the key themes and processes that have been selected as the focus for each of the eight essays provide a way to conceptualize the twentieth century as a coherent unit for teaching, as well as for written narrative and analysis. Though they do not exhaust the crucial strands of historical development that tie the century togetherââ¬âone could add, for example, nationalism and decolonizationââ¬âthey cover in depth the defining phenomena of that epoch, which, as the essays demonstrateRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words à |à 760 PagesDowden This book Logical Reasoning by Bradley H. Dowden is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. That is, you are free to share, copy, distribute, store, and transmit all or any part of the work under the following conditions: (1) Attribution You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author, namely by citing his name, the book title, and the relevant page numbers (but not in any way that suggests that the book Logical ReasoningRead MoreIgbo Dictionary129408 Words à |à 518 Pageswork, a Dictionary of the Ibo language: English-Ibo (1923). This latter work was also largely the responsibility of Dennis, and it is listed under his name in bibliographies, although his name does not appear on the title-page. The preface to this book gives its history as follows: While the Union-Ibo Version of the Bible was being prepared, the Assistant-Translator, Mr T.D. Anyaegbunam, was asked to make a list of new words as they occurred. Many additions were made to the list by the late Archdeacon
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Use of Soliloquies in Hamlet Essay - 941 Words
A soliloquy is a speech in a play that is meant to be heard by the audience but not the other characters on the stage. In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the use of soliloquies allows the audience to know what the characters are feeling and what their pure motives are. They are also able to hear the charactersââ¬â¢ thoughts directly. The characterââ¬â¢s secrets are revealed only to the audience which gives way for irony to take a part in the play. Shakespeare uses soliloquies throughout the play enhance the story by making the personal thoughts and feelings of characters open to the audience, creating irony, and setting a course of action. Hamlet has a number of soliloquies that express his thoughts and feelings throughout the play, forâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦It allows the audience to side with Hamlet and sympathize with him. In the soliloquies given by Hamlet, it is made known what he plans to do and his method of operation. After speaking with the Old Kingââ¬â¢s ghost and learning that his father was killed by his brother Claudius, Hamletââ¬â¢s main goal is to kill Claudius to avenge his fatherââ¬â¢s death. He begins to do so by pretending to be crazy. ââ¬Å"How strange or odd someââ¬â¢er I bear myself / (As I perchance hereafter shall think meet / To put an antic disposition on)â⬠(I.v. 190-192). Hamlet pretends to be crazy as a way to protect himself because it was believed that whoever kills a crazy person will also become crazy. This would allow Hamlet the time needed to devise a plan and kill Claudius. To verify that the Ghostââ¬â¢s statement about his cause of death is true, Hamlets sets up a ââ¬Å"mousetrapâ⬠to prove that indeed Claudius did kill the Old King. ââ¬Å"Iââ¬â¢ll have these players / Play something like the murder of my father / Before mine uncleâ⬠¦ The playââ¬â¢s the thing / Wherein Iââ¬â¢ll catch the conscience of the Kingâ⬠(II.ii.623-625, 633-634). By having the players reenact the murder Claudius committed and watching Claudiusââ¬â¢ reaction, Hamlet will be able to prove that what the Old Kingââ¬â¢s ghost said was true, and that he must avenge his fatherââ¬â¢s death. When the queen, his mother, asks Hamlet to speak with her, he lays out his priorities; what he wants to get out of theShow MoreRelatedEssay on The Use of Soliloquy in Shakespeares Hamlet1175 Words à |à 5 Pages A Soliloquy is a dramatic convention, in which the character stands alone on stage, speaking. Originally it was a plot device, to enable a character to tell the audience what he planned to do next, for example, in the course of revenge. But the device is heightened in Shakespeare as it enables a character to reveal the amp;#8216;inner soulamp;#8217; to the audience without telling the other characters. It is usual that one discovers more of a character from a soliloquy than from the action ofRead MoreShakespeares use of soliloquies to present Macbeth and Hamlet2032 Words à |à 9 Pagesdoes Shakespeare use soliloquies to present the characters of Macbeth and Hamlet? A soliloquy is a comprehensive and unremitting dialogue spoken by a single person. The speaker is presenting his or her thoughts audibly, thus providing a forthright, outspoken, unremitting, and uninterrupted flow of thought, which channels his or her consciousness directly to the audience. Shakespeare uses soliloquies to present the characters of Macbeth and Hamlet in speckled ways; the soliloquies define the thoughtsRead MoreShakespeares Use of Soliloquy To See Characters Thoughts in Hamlet926 Words à |à 4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare uses the literary technique of the soliloquy to allow the audience to see deeper into his charactersââ¬â¢ thoughts in his play, Hamlet. This technique helps to reveal Hamletââ¬â¢s true character, expressing emotions that the audience cannot see through his interactions with other characters. Through Hamletââ¬â¢s soliloquies, one may notice that his reluctance to take actions that involve death can be attributed to his fear of the unknown an d his uncertainty in regards to afterlife. Read MoreHamlet Soliloquy1530 Words à |à 7 Pagestime. In his plays, Shakespeare includes soliloquies, as they offer insight into the character, which cannot be done using dialogue. In Shakespeareââ¬â¢s Hamlet the seven soliloquies serve as the pillars of the play, the soliloquies introduce Hamletââ¬â¢s character but also develop his characterââ¬â¢s madness. Shakespeareââ¬â¢s use of blank verse, repetition, allusions and metaphors show that Hamlet is mentally unstable from the beginning of the play. Hamletââ¬â¢s first soliloquy in Act One Scene Two is his fourth longestRead MoreSoliloquies in Hamlet by William Shakespeare Essay1042 Words à |à 5 PagesA soliloquy is a literacy device that is used to reveal the innermost thoughts of a character. Shakespeare uses soliloquies to expose fascinating insights into the thoughts and actions of Hamlet and in doing so: the readers can grasp his character. The first soliloquy of the play, introduces the main theme for the rest of hamletââ¬â¢s thoughts and actions, this soliloquy allows the audience to understand hamlets inner thoughts that are repetitive throughout the play. Secondly, Hamletââ¬â¢s famous soliloquyRead MoreUnderstanding the Mind of Hamlet with His Soliloquies Essay678 Words à |à 3 PagesUnderstanding the Mind of Hamlet with His Soliloquies The term soliloquy is a literary or dramatic form of discourse, within which a character talks to himself and reveals his inner thoughts without addressing a listener. Hamlet uses soliloquies to express his feelings towards his dead father and self loathing to the reader of the play but to none of the characters within it. Hamlet has a complex character and it is important for the audience to be able to understandRead MoreThe Effects Of Soliloquy On Elizabethan Audience954 Words à |à 4 PagesDecember 18, 2015 Impact of Soliloquy on Elizabethan Audience In William Shakespeare s revenge tragedy play Hamlet, the prevailing themes of revenge, madness, and morality were recognized by the Elizabethan audience and appealed to them. The play s central focus is on a young prince, Hamlet, who has gone through many challenges to avenge his father s death. Prince Hamlet got his revenge on his deceitful uncle, Claudius, the same man who murdered his father and married Hamlet s mother. From the originalRead MoreFunction Of Shakespeare s Hamlet 1735 Words à |à 7 Pages Function of the soliloquies in Hamlet The soliloquy is a tool that helps reflect the inner thought of characters throughout the story, they bring out the thought process which could not be said in a normal conversation . This speech to the audience can be in the presence of other characters in the story plot but since it is oneââ¬â¢s inner thought , they can not hear it. Shakespeare uses this method to advance his plot in almost every play he ever written. The soliloquies function to advance theRead MoreEssay On The Tragedy Of Hamlet1122 Words à |à 5 Pagesof Hamletââ¬â¢s father becomes Hamletââ¬â¢s main struggle throughout the course of the play The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare. This play takes place mostly in the royal castle of Denmark in the late middle ages. The play follows Hamlet in his quest to determine the truthfulness of the ghost and to avenge the death of his father. In the play, major characters include Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, Laertes, Polonius, and Opheli a. Claudius is the King of Denmark and the ghostsRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Hamlet 1016 Words à |à 5 PagesENG4UO June 12th 2015 Hamlet s Downward Spiral to Insanity through Unique Soliloquies The true soliloquy is a speech that an actor delivers alone onstage to either himself or an audience.. In William Shakespeare Hamlet, Hamlets soliloquies appears to generally reveal that he is pure but that he has adapted impulsive behaviour and enters his downfall into mental instability. Nonetheless, the soliloquies and set speeches have a fulfillment of place revealing much about Hamlet and his overall development
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Human Nature Persuasive Essay Example For Students
Human Nature Persuasive Essay ESSAY CATEGORY: Philosophy Human natureGrade: BLanguage: EnglishSystem:Country: TaiwanAuthors Comments:Teachers Comments: 11/6/96 Our life is full of problems. Reasoning is a usual way to response to problems which we concern about. We reason in response to everyday problems. For instance, asked by friends to go out dinner at a time when we have planned something else, we must decide which one is more important for us at that moment of time, and whether to decline or to adjust our schedule. Reasoning appropriate to problems like this has often been called practical. Practical reasons might be said to be reasons for acting, and it is in some sense point toward action. Practical reasoning has been much discussed by philosophers, and it is catalogued under Moral Philosophy. For Aristotles moral philosophy, as it appears in his document now called the Nicomachean ethics, reflects his teleological (goal-oriented) metaphyics. In the Nicomachean ethics, where Aristotle considers a science of doing, and acting in certain way to seek rational ends. The notion of Goal, or Purpose, is the principal one in his moral theory. Aristotle noted that every act is performed for some purpose, which he defined as the good of that act, the end at which the activity aims. We perform an act because we find its purpose to be worthwhile. Either the totality of our acts is an infinitely circular series: Every morning we get up in order to eat breakfast, we eat breakfast in order to go to work, we got to work in order to get money, we get money so we can buy food in order to be able to eat breakfast, etc., etc., etc., in which case life would be a pretty meaningless endeavor because this is just bunch of repeated and vain activities practicing if without a purpose. Or there is some ultimate good toward which the purpose of all acts are directed. If there is such a good, we should try to come to know it so that we can adjust all our acts toward it in order to avoid that saddest of all tr agedies the wasted and vain life According to Aristotle, there is general verbal agreement that the end toward which all human acts are directed is happiness; therefore, happiness is the human good since we seek happiness for its own sake, not for the sake of something else. In a sense, realizing the end of attaining happiness is an activity of making, and its the activity aims to make a certain kind of man, living in a certain kind of society. Happiness might be explained as the fruition of a mans way of life, in the truly human aspect of that way of life. The good of each thing is its own function; thus, vision is the good of the eye and walking is the good of the foot. As Aristotle said in the Nicomachean ethics, Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim. (11) However, unless we philosophize about happiness and get to know exactly w hat it is and how to achieve it, it will be stereotyped simply to say that happiness is the ultimate good. To determine the nature of happiness, Aristotle turned to his metaphysical schema and asked, What is the function of the human? In the same way he would ask about the function of a knife or a cloth. He came to the conclusion that a humans function is to engage in an activity of the soul which is in accordance with virtue and which follows a rational principle. Before grasping this complicated definition , we must determine what virtues is and what kinds of virtues there are. But first, we must have a basic understanding that Aristotle believed that certain material conditions must hold before happiness can be achieved. This list of conditions will show Aristotles elitism: We need good friends, riches, and political power. We need a good birth, good children, and good looks. For the man who is very ugly in appearance is not likely to be happy. Also we must not be very short. Furthermore, we must be free from the need of performing manual labor. According to Aristotle, no man can practice virtue who is living the life of a mechanic or laborer. Personally, I am strongly disagree on these conditions which Aristotle had claimed as the criteria toward Happiness. There should not have a set of conditions or definitions on Happiness because different people have different ways of understand happiness, and different people have different beliefs and goals toward their own life. It should be noted that Aristotles moral theory would be left substantially perfect if his elitist bias were deleted. Now, as to virtues, there are two kinds: Intellectual and moral, corresponding to the two parts of the soul. Intellectual virtues are acquired through a combination of inheritance and education, and moral virtues through imitation, practice, and habit. The habits that we develop result in states of character, that is , in dispositions to act certain ways, and these states of character are virtuous for Aristotle if they result in acts that are in accordance with a golden mean of moderation. Courage is a mean between cowardice and foolhardi ness. For example, when it comes to facing danger, one can act with excess, that is, show too much fear. (This is cowardice.) Or one can act deficiently by showing too little fear. (This is foolhardiness.) Or one can act with moderation, and hence virtuously, by showing the right amount of fear. (This is courage.) Aristotle realized that the choices we must make if we are to learn moral virtue cannot be made mathematically; rather, they are always context-bound and must be approached through trial and error. Returning to the intellectual virtues of practical and philosophical wisdom, the former is the wisdom necessary to make judgments consistent with ones understanding of the good life. It is therefore related to moral virtue. Philosophical wisdom is scientific, disinterested, and contemplative. It is associated with pure reason, and, for Aristotle, the capacity for reason is that which is most human; therefore, philosophical wisdom is the highest virtue. So, when Aristotle defined happiness as an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, the activity referred to is philosophical activity. The human being can only be happy by leading a contemplative life, but not a monastic one. We are not only philosophical animals but also social ones. We are engaged in a would where decisions concerning practical matters are forced upon us constantly. Happiness (hence the good life) requires excellence in both spheres. Therefore, in the Aristotelian view, that the highest virtue is for the few. In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that the function of man is an activity of soul which follows a rational principle which based on both virtues. Human good turns out to be activity of soul in accordance with virtue, and if there are more than one virtue, in accordance with the best and most complete. But we must add in a complete life. For one swallow does not make a summer, nor does on day; and so too one day, or a short time, does not make a man blessed and happy. One who is trying to live according to a rational principle as what Aristotle suggested, aiming for happiness, will surely find that such a life is very difficult, that the swallows do not long remain, that the happy days do not last. What we try to do, in living out our days of contested moral positions, is to seek happiness. But usually what we find is very little happiness and very much despair, especially in the long run, in a complete life. Aristotles end A happy man in a complete life seems unrealistic . As mentioned before, different people might hold different belief toward happiness. Belief is that upon which a man is prepared to act. Beliefs, then, are rules of action, and they got their meaning from the action for which they are rules. Beliefs produced habits, and that the way to distinguish between beliefs was to compare the habits they produced. A persons belief could be established by observing that persons actions If certain people believed that God existed, they would conceive of the world very differently from the way they would conceive of it if they believed God did not exist. Also, their definition toward happiness would also be very different from those who do not believe in God. However, there are other people whose conceptions of the world would be practically identical whether they believed that God did or did not exist. For certain other people who find themselves somewhere between these two extremes, the proposition God exists means something like this: On Sunday, I put on nice clothes and go to church. This is because, for them, engaging in this activity is the only practical outcome of their belief. For those who are Christian, richness might not have so much meaning to them. It is because their definition on happiness is not depend on how rich you are, and this is exactly why I opposed Aristotles elitism. C learly, practical reasoning which Aristotle founded it provides a way to understand and explain actions. There are two important points with this founding. First, the method is reasoning in the context of a desired end, at least typically in a way that includes a commitment to some principle or belief. This provides motivation for the action issuing from the reasoning. Second, this provides guidance for the action. It is exercised in part by a belief to the effect that the end can be achieved by a certain kind of action, for instance, in order for reaching a sweet, one might go buy some candy. The belief helps to sustain and guide the action. In conclude, Happiness is not a further end of the action, but its essential end. To act for a reason is to act in order to achieve an end, whether ultimate or, more often, subsidiary, as when we prescribe medicine in order to cure. Actions performed for a reason very commonly issue from practical reasoning; and if Aristotle does not think the y always do, he at least holds that they are motivationally attached by a purposive chain which terminates in a desire for happiness and can be associated, link by link, with practical arguments that concern the relevant want, belief, and action, or at least of all action performed for a reason, is behavioral foundationalism. Our life is full of problems. Reasoning is a usual way to response to problems which we concern about. We reason in response to everyday problems. For instance, asked by friends to go out dinner at a time when we have planned something else, we must decide which one is more important for us at that moment of time, and whether to decline or to adjust our schedule. Reasoning appropriate to problems like this has often been called practical. Practical reasons might be said to be reasons for acting, and it is in some sense point toward action. Practical reasoning has been much discussed by philosophers, and it is catalogued under Moral Philosophy. For Aristotles m oral philosophy, as it appears in his document now called the Nicomachean ethics, reflects his teleological (goal-oriented) metaphyics. In the Nicomachean ethics, where Aristotle considers a science of doing, and acting in certain way to seek rational ends. The notion of Goal, or Purpose, is the principal one in his moral theory. Aristotle noted that every act is performed for some purpose, which he defined as the good of that act, the end at which the activity aims. We perform an act because we find its purpose to be worthwhile. Either the totality of our acts is an infinitely circular series: Every morning we get up in order to eat breakfast, we eat breakfast in order to go to work, we got to work in order to get money, we get money so we can buy food in order to be able to eat breakfast, etc., etc., etc., in which case life would be a pretty meaningless endeavor because this is just bunch of repeated and vain activities practicing if without a purpose. Or there is some ultimate good toward which the purpose of all acts are directed. If there is such a good, we should try to come to know it so that we can adjust all our acts toward it in order to avoid that saddest of all tragedies the wasted and vain life According to Aristotle, there is general verbal agreement that the end toward which all human acts are directed is happiness; therefore, happiness is the human good since we seek happiness for its own sake, not for the sake of something else. In a sense, realizing the end of attaining happiness is an activity of making, and its the activity aims to make a certain kind of man, living in a certain kind of society. Happiness might be explained as the fruition of a mans way of life, in the truly human aspect of that way of life. The good of each thing is its own function; thus, vision is the good of the eye and walking is the good of the foot. As Aristotle said in the Nicomachean ethics, Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim. (11) However, unless we philosophize about happiness and get to know exactly what it is and how to achieve it, it will be stereotyped simply to say that happiness is the ultimate good. To determine the nature of happiness, Aristotle turned to his metaphysical schema and asked, What is the function of the human? In the same way he would ask about the function of a knife or a cloth. He came to the conclusion that a humans function is to engage in an activity of the soul which is in accordance with virtue and which follows a rational principle. Before grasping this complicated definition , we must determine what virtues is and what kinds of virtues there are. But first, we must have a basic understanding that Aristotle believed that certain material conditions must hold before happiness can be achieved. This list of conditions will show Aristotles elitism: We need g ood friends, riches, and political power. We need a good birth, good children, and good looks. For the man who is very ugly in appearance is not likely to be happy. Also we must not be very short. John F. Kennedy Essay A persons belief could be established by observing that persons actions If certain people believed that God existed, they would conceive of the world very differently from the way they would conceive of it if they believed God did not exist. Also, their definition toward happiness would also be very different from those who do not believe in God. However, there are other people whose conceptions of the world would be practically identical whether they believed that God did or did not exist. For certain other people who find themselves somewhere between these two extremes, the proposition God exists means something like this: On Sunday, I put on nice clothes and go to church. This is because, for them, engaging in this activity is the only practical outcome of their belief. For those who are Christian, richness might not have so much meaning to them. It is because their definition on happiness is not depend on how rich you are, and this is exactly why I opposed Aristotles elitism. Clearly, practical reasoning which Aristotle founded it provides a way to understand and explain actions. There are two important points with this founding. First, the method is reasoning in the context of a desired end, at least typically in a way that includes a commitment to some principle or belief. This provides motivation for the action issuing from the reasoning. Second, this provides guidance for the action. It is exercised in part by a belief to the effect that the end can be achieved by a certain kind of action, for instance, in order for reaching a sweet, one might go buy some candy. The belief helps to sustain and guide the action. In conclude, Happiness is not a further end of the action, but its essential end. To act for a reason is to act in order to achieve an end, whether ultimate or, more often, subsidiary, as when we prescribe medicine in order to cure. Actions performed for a reason very commonly issue from practical reasoning; and if Arist otle does not think they always do, he at least holds that they are motivationally attached by a purposive chain which terminates in a desire for happiness and can be associated, link by link, with practical arguments that concern the relevant want, belief, and action, or at least of all action performed for a reason, is behavioral foundationalism. Our life is full of problems. Reasoning is a usual way to response to problems which we concern about. We reason in response to everyday problems. For instance, asked by friends to go out dinner at a time when we have planned something else, we must decide which one is more important for us at that moment of time, and whether to decline or to adjust our schedule. Reasoning appropriate to problems like this has often been called practical. Practical reasons might be said to be reasons for acting, and it is in some sense point toward action. Practical reasoning has been much discussed by philosophers, and it is catalogued under Moral Philo sophy. For Aristotles moral philosophy, as it appears in his document now called the Nicomachean ethics, reflects his teleological (goal-oriented) metaphyics. In the Nicomachean ethics, where Aristotle considers a science of doing, and acting in certain way to seek rational ends. The notion of Goal, or Purpose, is the principal one in his moral theory. Aristotle noted that every act is performed for some purpose, which he defined as the good of that act, the end at which the activity aims. We perform an act because we find its purpose to be worthwhile. Either the totality of our acts is an infinitely circular series: Every morning we get up in order to eat breakfast, we eat breakfast in order to go to work, we got to work in order to get money, we get money so we can buy food in order to be able to eat breakfast, etc., etc., etc., in which case life would be a pretty meaningless endeavor because this is just bunch of repeated and vain activities practicing if without a purpose. Or there is some ultimate good toward which the purpose of all acts are directed. If there is such a good, we should try to come to know it so that we can adjust all our acts toward it in order to avoid that saddest of all tragedies the wasted and vain life According to Aristotle, there is general verbal agreement that the end toward which all human acts are directed is happiness; therefore, happiness is the human good since we seek happiness for its own sake, not for the sake of something else. In a sense, realizing the end of attaining happiness is an activity of making, and its the activity aims to make a certain kind of man, living in a certain kind of society. Happiness might be explained as the fruition of a mans way of life, in the truly human aspect of that way of life. The good of each thing is its own function; thus, vision is the good of the eye and walking is the good of the foot. As Aristotle said in the Nicomachean ethics, Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim. (11) However, unless we philosophize about happiness and get to know exactly what it is and how to achieve it, it will be stereotyped simply to say that happiness is the ultimate good. To determine the nature of happiness, Aristotle turned to his metaphysical schema and asked, What is the function of the human? In the same way he would ask about the function of a knife or a cloth. He came to the conclusion that a humans function is to engage in an activity of the soul which is in accordance with virtue and which follows a rational principle. Before grasping this complicated definition , we must determine what virtues is and what kinds of virtues there are. But first, we must have a basic understanding that Aristotle believed that certain material conditions must hold before happiness can be achieved. This list of conditions will show Aristo tles elitism: We need good friends, riches, and political power. We need a good birth, good children, and good looks. For the man who is very ugly in appearance is not likely to be happy. Also we must not be very short. Furthermore, we must be freWords/ Pages : 9,071 / 24
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)